K's Mumbo Jumbo

Sep 11 2012
Sep 10 2012
nikosnature:

batatonia:

religiousragings:

abaldwin360:

commonsenseslut:

I’m in a really pissy mood today, so I wasn’t going to post anything, but this just grabbed my attention. Once again: I’m in a pissy mood so this will be a pissed off post:
This man genuinly thinks of himself as intelligent, genuinly does. And then he goes and answer a question like this. Yeah, let’s take out a woman’s fallopian tube so that we can avoid the horrible thing that is abortion, because abortion is horrible because it’s called abortion! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?
Okay, I’m going to stop there, because that’s about as nice as I can be today, lol.

What is this fuckery???
So, remove the fallopian tubes so it’s not “technically” an abortion?
This is some ignorant shit.

WTF kind of ignorant, double-think fuckery makes someone think that this is acceptable?  Let’s perform unnecessary surgery, causing unnecessary damage to a woman, so we don’t have to use the evil fucking A WORD for it?  FUCK YOU, NIKO!!!!

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a good screenshot of this guy on my dash.

Well, given the high density of the responses I received for this comment, I wasn’t planning on defending it. But there seems to be some confusion about the principle of double effect.  Here’s the wikipedia page.  Happy learning!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_double_effect

No. Just no. Women deserve health care that is determined by medical professionals. NOT SOME RELIGIOUS IDEA. Not all pregnant people are Christian. Not all pregnant people are willing to die for an already forgone conclusion (that the fetus will not survive). That the ignorant MAN needs to redefine my health care, that is not acceptable. Period. Stop trying to defend your sexist hate.

nikosnature:

batatonia:

religiousragings:

abaldwin360:

commonsenseslut:

I’m in a really pissy mood today, so I wasn’t going to post anything, but this just grabbed my attention. Once again: I’m in a pissy mood so this will be a pissed off post:

This man genuinly thinks of himself as intelligent, genuinly does. And then he goes and answer a question like this. Yeah, let’s take out a woman’s fallopian tube so that we can avoid the horrible thing that is abortion, because abortion is horrible because it’s called abortion! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?

Okay, I’m going to stop there, because that’s about as nice as I can be today, lol.

What is this fuckery???

So, remove the fallopian tubes so it’s not “technically” an abortion?

This is some ignorant shit.

WTF kind of ignorant, double-think fuckery makes someone think that this is acceptable?  Let’s perform unnecessary surgery, causing unnecessary damage to a woman, so we don’t have to use the evil fucking A WORD for it?  FUCK YOU, NIKO!!!!

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a good screenshot of this guy on my dash.

Well, given the high density of the responses I received for this comment, I wasn’t planning on defending it. But there seems to be some confusion about the principle of double effect.  Here’s the wikipedia page.  Happy learning!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_double_effect

No. Just no. Women deserve health care that is determined by medical professionals. NOT SOME RELIGIOUS IDEA. Not all pregnant people are Christian. Not all pregnant people are willing to die for an already forgone conclusion (that the fetus will not survive).
That the ignorant MAN needs to redefine my health care, that is not acceptable. Period. Stop trying to defend your sexist hate.

(Source: damnsoprochoice)

206 notes

Aug 14 2012
Aug 07 2012
+
Aug 04 2012

Wait Wait Wait

andigreyscale:

crudivore:

Anti-lifers are always saying that the unborn cannot be compared to the already born…

…yet they say that no one has the right to use another persons body against their will.

I assume that “no one” includes the already born as well as the unborn, right?

Your inconsistency is showing…

The above does not make any sense.

You’re ignorance is showing…

“Anti-Lifers”? Not even close. Stop that tired bullshit.
We support fully and totally the pregnant persons right to chose how best to actually live their life. We know that we don’t know what is best for that ALREADY ALIVE person. But they do know what will be best for them.

Now onto your incredibly horrible non-argument. All your argument does is show that yes, the fetus has no right to use a body without the owner of that bodies permission. If I am pregnant I am not using the fetuses body. I am supporting it.

(via andigreyscale)

18 notes

Aug 01 2012
Jul 30 2012

prolife4ever:

I am so sick of seeing “I hope you get raped” and “You should have been aborted” messages sent to pro-life blogs. I know all you pro-choicers don’t feel that way, but I see it way too often from immature people who refuse to acknowledge that they’re still talking to a person, whether or not it is behind a computer screen. You should be ashamed of yourselves. You can’t accuse us of being hateful when you are saying things like that.

-Amanda

Yes, we can accuse you of being hateful. Because we are not killing doctors, or bombing clinics or harrassing women on the street. 

I was harrassed by the nurse in recovery after my LIFE saving abortion. That, dear Amanda, that is hateful. I get messages from the “pro-life” side daily telling me the same things you are complaining about. 

When you take away my right to bodily autonomy, I will get angry. I will fight back. 

And here is a little tip for you, the messages are usually trolls. Welcome to the internet, now get out of my uterus. 

48 notes

Jul 20 2012
wswni:

OI fuckwit! See the word CHOSE? That means she had a CHOICE. 
My mother is completely and utterly 100% PRO-CHOICE. 
She CHOSE to have me. 

Not all pregnant people get that choice. Both my birth mother and my brother’s birth mothers were denied that choice. They were forced to remain pregnant. My brother’s birth mother suffered horrible emotional trauma from that experience.
I have heath conditions that will never leave me, because I did not receive adequate medical care, because I was a desperately unwanted,but forced pregnancy.
Pregnant people who do not have the choice to abort suffer greatly. The fetus does not suffer in an abortion. But a fetus can suffer greatly from prenatal neglect.There is more life involved in a pregnancy than just the fetus. And that life has more potential.

wswni:

OI fuckwit! See the word CHOSE? That means she had a CHOICE. 

My mother is completely and utterly 100% PRO-CHOICE. 

She CHOSE to have me. 

Not all pregnant people get that choice. Both my birth mother and my brother’s birth mothers were denied that choice. They were forced to remain pregnant. My brother’s birth mother suffered horrible emotional trauma from that experience.

I have heath conditions that will never leave me, because I did not receive adequate medical care, because I was a desperately unwanted,but forced pregnancy.

Pregnant people who do not have the choice to abort suffer greatly. The fetus does not suffer in an abortion. But a fetus can suffer greatly from prenatal neglect.

There is more life involved in a pregnancy than just the fetus. And that life has more potential.

(Source: checkmateprochoicers, via wswni-deactivated20121106)

255 notes

Jul 12 2012
Page 3 of 25 Newer entries →